Multi-entity accounting oversight software: centralise your financial management
When financial data comes from many systems and contexts, leadership needs unified, consistent oversight to make better strategic decisions.
Unify your financial oversight and move from data to decisions
-
1 Centralise and harmonise your accounting and financial data
-
2 Strengthen strategic decision-making
Centralise and harmonise your accounting and financial data
Standardise, centralise, interpret. Consistent, precise financial oversight depends on the quality of your financial data and how easily it can be interpreted:
- Overcome the constraints of diverse sources and contexts: centralise and standardise all your data, whatever the ERP, chart of accounts, language, or currency, within a single group framework
- Use consistent risk indicators across your entire scope and standardise control workflows
- Collaborate easily with every stakeholder in the accounting and finance value chain on a single platform
Strengthen strategic decision-making
Steer your performance where it creates the most value, and give leadership and stakeholders confidence in how your accounting and financial information is controlled, with:
- Objective analysis of the efficiency of your accounting processes and the quality of your financial information
- Intuitive dashboards covering your entire scope, with key performance indicators
- A comprehensive, customisable library of controls
- Detection of subtle red flags and anomalies through AI-enhanced controls
Take action:
explore our solutions
Closing: the solution to streamline and accelerate your reviews and closing processes
Geoficiency: the solution for risk detection, compliance, and operational efficiency
Frequently Asked Questions about
Accounting Oversight
1. How can you make sure smaller subsidiaries meet anti-corruption requirements?
Not all entities within a group carry the same level of exposure. Applying the same accounting control intensity everywhere is counterproductive and drains resources. A proportionate approach works better: enhanced, more frequent reviews for high-risk subsidiaries (sensitive geographies, activities exposed to the public sector, other high-risk activities, etc.), and lighter or rotating reviews for low-criticality entities. The goal is a consistent group-wide framework that adapts to local risks without overwhelming smaller teams.
2. How can you make sure key accounting controls are applied consistently across all entities?
In a multi-entity group, it is tempting to let each subsidiary adapt its controls to its local context: different ERP systems, specific charts of accounts, teams with varying resources. The result is a set-up that looks comprehensive on paper, but whose actual implementation cannot be verified from group headquarters. Consistency requires a set of non-negotiable controls common to all entities, standardised implementation and documentation procedures, and centralised progress monitoring that does not rely on reports from local teams.
3. How can you improve group visibility, particularly over small subsidiaries?
Small entities are a paradox: they have fewer resources for control, but their risk is not necessarily smaller. A drift towards manual entries, approval procedures being bypassed, or late account reconciliations can go unnoticed for several cycles without proper oversight. Improving group visibility does not necessarily mean more on-site audits, but rather risk indicators monitored regularly and consistently across the entire scope, capable of flagging local anomalies before they escalate.
4. How can you get a real-time view of close progress and bottlenecks?
Without a centralised dashboard, account review and reconciliation work is tracked through email reminders and follow-up meetings, which creates a heavy coordination burden and hides bottlenecks until they become critical. A real-time consolidated view by entity and by task helps you anticipate delays and set priorities before the close calendar slips.
